Morrow Kessler & Dowsing

Steven J. Kessler, one of their partners, bore testimony to a grossly inflated salary calculation during my binding arbitration divorce process in 2011.
Without even looking at my resume — a fact he admitted to during cross-​examination — he asserted that I should be able to earn $ 200,000/year as a corporate executive. (This was to be used to calculate child support). A salary I never came even close to in my life.
In addition, his original assessment was $ 150,000, but he raised it to $ 200,000 because my ex-​wife (she hired him be her witness during the arbitration case) told him to do so. He was, it turned out, basing his entire assessment on a few emails sent to him by his client. He never had access to any version of my actual resume.
Were it not for the fact that my own attorney dismantled his under-​oath testimony, I could have been financially damaged by his rather alarming and grossly inaccurate testimony.
Of all the unpleasantness of the divorce, as most divorces are unpleasant, Kessler’s testimony stands out as the most flagrant and unprofessional aspect of it.
Had he looked at my own public LinkedIn resume, he could have based his testimony on actual facts and not guesswork that could have seriously hurt me had my own attorney not noticed what was happening.
You decide for yourself if this is the kind of company you can trust or not.
You are welcome to contact me to verify this and/​or talk to me about it.